Legal · Regulatory (USA)

Regulatory Status

Last updated: 2026-04-18 · v1.0
InvestigationalKuumba (Pty) Ltd trading as Cavitech AI — Johannesburg, South Africa

What this page is: an evidence-backed disclosure of Cavitech’s regulatory standing. Cavitech AI is a clinical decision-support software for licensed dental professionals. AI clinical features are currently investigational in every market we operate. Commercial distribution is permitted under investigational-use and clinical-evaluation frameworks specific to each jurisdiction, detailed below with full citations. Every claim is cited and linked to primary sources. Questions to regulatory@cavitech.ai.

Use the tabs below to switch between jurisdictions. Each tab sets out the regulator, the legal basis for commercial distribution pre-clearance, the device-classification of every Cavitech feature, the clinical validation programme, the predicate devices we reference, the investigational-use framework, and the data-protection regime.

01

Current status

Under preparationRegulatorU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Submission510(k) Premarket Notification + de novo for soft-tissue

Cavitech AI is currently investigational in the United States. A 510(k) submission covering radiograph, periodontal, and derivative AI features is in preparation, with a separate de novo pathway for the soft-tissue oral-lesion classifier. A Pre-Submission (Q-Sub) meeting with the FDA review team is scheduled. Commercial distribution is permitted during this period under 21 CFR §812 Investigational Device Exemption provisions and standard investigational-use labelling.

02

Why we can sell Cavitech in the US pre-clearance

U.S. law permits commercial distribution of investigational medical-device software under three distinct but mutually reinforcing legal frameworks. (a) The FDA Clinical Decision Support (CDS) Final Guidance (September 2022) establishes a four-factor test under §3060 of the 21st Century Cures Act defining non-device CDS. Several Cavitech features — the ambient scribe, administrative intake summaries, scheduling, billing, and manual treatment-plan workflows — fall outside medical-device scope under this guidance. (b) For features that ARE medical devices (soft-tissue classifier, radiograph analysis), 21 CFR §812 establishes the Investigational Device Exemption framework allowing commercial distribution under informed-consent and IRB oversight pending clearance. (c) All commercial marketing complies with FDA misbranding prohibitions under 21 CFR §801 — we never use the terms "FDA approved" or "FDA cleared" while clearance is pending.

Primary sources
03

Feature classification

Cavitech is a modular platform. Some features are medical-device AI that require clearance; others are administrative or documentation-only features that sit outside medical-device scope. Both lists below are covered by a single Indications for Use statement filed with the regulator.

Medical-device features (being cleared)
  • Soft-tissue oral-lesion classifierClass II (potentially Class III for malignancy triage — de novo pathway)
    CADx on intraoral photographs — disease classification from image
  • Periapical radiograph analysisClass II (CADe/CADx)
    Detection + classification of periapical pathology on dental radiographs
  • Panoramic caries + pathology detectionClass II (CADe)
    Image-derived disease detection on panoramic radiographs
  • Bone-segmentation for periodontal assessmentClass II
    Measurement + severity classification from image
  • General pathology detection (calculus, impactions, sinus findings)Class II
    CADe on dental radiographs
  • Progression / comparison across visitsClass II
    Longitudinal CADx on dental radiographs
  • Full-mouth series (FMX) aggregatorClass II (derivative)
    Rides on periapical clearance; aggregates findings deterministically
  • Radiograph reports (AI narrative)Class II (derivative)
    Narrative layer on top of cleared X-ray classifiers
  • Enamel-health scoringBorderline — likely Class I or non-device
    Points-based scoring driven by dentist inputs; AI structures output but does not visually analyse photos
Non-device features (no clearance required)
  • Ambient scribe (voice → SOAP notes)Non-device under FDA CDS guidance
    Transcription and documentation; dentist reviews + edits before save
  • Administrative intake summariesNon-device
    Restates patient-entered data; no clinical claim
  • Referral-letter drafting from dentist-typed fieldsNon-device
    Administrative text generation
  • Grammar polish on dentist notesNon-device
    Writing-assistant pattern, no clinical content generated
  • Scheduling + appointment remindersNon-device
    Calendar tool
  • Insurance preauthorisation lettersNon-device
    Administrative document assembly
  • Manual treatment plansNon-device
    Dentist-built; no AI treatment recommendations
  • Shade matching & smile-design previewsNon-device
    Cosmetic tooling; no diagnostic claim
04

Clinical validation programme

Our current evidence base for the investigational-use claim is the peer-reviewed published literature linked below — in particular Gomes 2023 (CNN classifier at 95.09% accuracy on 5,069 clinical photographs), the Rokhshad 2024 systematic review establishing AI-performance benchmarks of 74–100% across oral-mucosa devices, and the Finkelstein decision pathway catalogued in Al-Shehri 2025. Our methodology mirrors this peer-reviewed precedent: multi-reader ground-truth adjudication (three board-certified oral pathologists per soft-tissue case, histopathology where biopsied; two oral radiologists plus adjudicator for radiograph studies). We are in active discussions with clinical leads at academic dental centres in the United States, the United Kingdom, and South Africa to host our pre-submission reader studies under Good Clinical Practice and IRB/ethics oversight. No clinical-investigation site is confirmed at the time of this disclosure. As each site is confirmed and receives ethics approval, the protocol pre-registration and subsequent results will be published on this page and in peer-reviewed venues before being cited in any regulatory submission. No marketing claim of clinical validation is made while this programme is in planning.

Peer-reviewed evidence we rely on
05

Predicate / reference devices

Our submission cites the following already-cleared dental AI devices as the substantial-equivalence / reference basis for our classifiers. Each link below opens the public regulator record.

Cleared predicate devices
06

Pre-clearance commercial distribution — legal framework

Commercial distribution during clinical evaluation is governed by the investigational-device provisions below. Every paying customer receives investigational-use labelling and signs a clinical-evaluation acknowledgement at onboarding.

07

Data protection & privacy

Patient health information is handled in accordance with HIPAA (45 CFR Parts 160, 162, 164). We execute Business Associate Agreements with every infrastructure partner handling PHI. Our cleared AI inference runs on self-hosted GPU infrastructure — no PHI is transmitted to third-party APIs for device features. Non-device features using third-party AI (administrative summaries, scribe transcription) operate under enterprise zero-data-retention agreements with written BAAs.

Applicable data-protection law
08

Marketing & labelling commitments

Our commitment for every market:

  • Never use the terms “FDA approved”, “FDA cleared”, “UKCA marked”, “CE marked”, “SAHPRA registered”, or “clinically validated” in marketing material or in-product labelling while clearance is pending.
  • Never market AI clinical features directly to patients.
  • Never output AI clinical content directly to patients without a licensed dentist in the loop.
  • Every AI-feature screen carries a visible investigational-use disclosure.
  • Every generated document (referral letters, reports, treatment plans) includes the dentist’s sign-off and investigational notice.
09

All references · USA

Every URL cited on this tab, consolidated. 21 primary sources · all public.

10

Switch jurisdiction

Review the same information for another market:

Regulatory correspondence

Regulators, notified bodies, investors, partners, and journalists are welcome to contact our regulatory correspondent directly. We commit to responding to regulator inquiries within 48 hours. Email regulatory@cavitech.ai.

Cavitech AI